09-27-2013, 09:22 AM
Anonymous
It does not stand to reason that the authors of the gospels were inactive writers, but as a physician, Luke was too precise and academic in his writings to be accidentally contradictory. If 'Q' is authentic to the time period, it must have been a forgery, yet as the author of this article states, there is sufficient evidence to state it is a modern-day sham.
It does not stand to reason that the authors of the gospels were inactive writers, but as a physician, Luke was too precise and academic in his writings to be accidentally contradictory. If 'Q' is authentic to the time period, it must have been a forgery, yet as the author of this article states, there is sufficient evidence to state it is a modern-day sham.