08-01-2016, 07:59 AM
I think the camera would see the illusion/weave just as the naked eye would. It can't record the weaves themselves or show they're illusions, but it can show the effect of them. It's still a visual manifestation of the power.
Course, it's a tricky one and you could argue the opposite effectively too!
Edit: That is to say, the camera would see the same as the naked eye belonging to a non-channeler.
Edited by Thalia, Aug 1 2016, 08:01 AM.
Course, it's a tricky one and you could argue the opposite effectively too!
Edit: That is to say, the camera would see the same as the naked eye belonging to a non-channeler.
Edited by Thalia, Aug 1 2016, 08:01 AM.